117.1.
[Under the king Ancus Marcius, trad. 640-616 BC] the
Janiculum hill was also added to the city, not from lack of space
but to prevent its becoming the elevated stronghold of an attacking
enemy. It was decided not only to join the Janiculum to the city
with a wall but to facilitate traffic across the river in each
direction with the Pons Sublicius, the first bridge built on the
Tiber.
Livy, History
1.33.6
117.2.
[Lars Porsenna, an Etruscan ruler near Rome, attempted
in 508 BC to retake Rome for the expelled Etruscan king Tarquinius.]
When the enemy appeared, all the Romans left the fields of their own
accord and came into the city and ringed it with guards. The city
appeared secure, protected by the walls in some spots and by the
Tiber in others. The Pons Sublicius, however, very nearly gave the
enemy a passage into the city—an event prevented by one man alone:
Horatius Cocles. On him did the City of Rome rely for her defense
that day.
Horatius happened to be stationed on the bridge when he
witnessed the Janiculum captured in a surprise attack, the enemy
rushing down to the river, and the panicked mob of his fellow
soldiers abandoning their weapons and posts on the far
bank. He took hold of one man after the other, preventing his
retreat, and swearing by the good faith of gods and men that if they
abandoned their posts all flight would be in vain: if they left the
bridge standing behind them after they crossed, there would soon be
more enemy soldiers on the Palatine and Capitoline hills than on the
Janiculum. And so warning them of this danger, he commanded them to
demolish the bridge with iron and fire and any force possible; he
himself would hold off the enemy, as much as one man could. Then he
strode to the far side of the bridge, conspicuous among the other
men who were so obviously shunning combat, and there took his stand,
armed and ready for hand-to-hand combat. The Etruscans were stunned
by his audacity, and shame kept two of his own men by his side,
Spurius Larcius and Titus Herminius, distinguished by both their
family names and their deeds.
For a short while the three of them together withstood
the first wave of attackers and the initial, most violent onslaught.
Then, with the bridge behind them scarcely still standing, and with
those who were demolishing it calling for them to come back,
Horatius made his two companions retreat to safety. Casting
aggressive, threatening glances at the Etruscan leaders, he
challenged them individually and ridiculed them all: slaves to
arrogant kings and forgetful of their own liberty, here they were
trying to stamp out the liberty of others. For some time the
soldiers hesitated, each of them looking around to encourage someone
else to start the fight. Shame then provoked the attack, and raising
a shout they threw their javelins from all sides against a single
enemy. After all of the missiles simply stuck in his shield, and the
obstinate Roman still occupied the bridge with his massive stance,
the soldiers were attempting to dislodge him with a charge when in
one instant both the loud crash of the falling bridge and the shout
of the Romans cheering their success halted the Etruscan attack with
sudden dismay. Then Cocles spoke: “Father Tiberinus, I
call on you in solemn prayer: receive these arms and this thy
soldier in your merciful stream.” Then fully armed as he
was, he jumped off into the Tiber and swam beneath a shower of
javelins to arrive safely by his comrades. Thus did Horatius dare to
perform an act of heroism that would find more fame among posterity
than credence. The grateful city placed a statue of him in the
Comitium, and gave him as much farmland as he could plough in a day.
Livy, History
2.10.1-12
117.3.
Most writers explain the origins of the word
“pontifex” with a ridiculous etymology, claiming
it refers to men who were called “bridge doers”
because they did [Latin: fac-] sacrifices of great sanctity and antiquity at the
bridge across the Tiber (pont being the root for
“bridge” in Latin). Moreover, the safe-keeping
and repair of the bridge, as with other inviolate and
ancestral rites, belongs to the priests, and the Romans consider the
destruction of the wooden bridge not only illegal but sacrilegious.
It is also said that, in accordance with some oracle, the entire
bridge contains no iron and is joined together by wooden dowels. The
stone bridge was built much later by the quaestor Aemilius. The
wooden bridge itself, it is said, was finished not under Numa but
when Ancus Marcius (the grandson of Numa) was king.
Plutarch, Numa
9.2-3
117.4.
[Pliny is speaking of wonders of architecture.] At
Cyzicus [a town near Troy] there is a large building they call the
Council House; built without any iron nails, it is framed in such a
way that beams can be removed and replaced without the aid of
scaffolding. The same conditions are a religious requirement at the
Pile Bridge in Rome, ever since it proved difficult to dismantle
during its defense by Horatius Cocles.
Pliny the Elder, Encyclopedia
36.100
|